Minimum Viable Product

Build the smallest thing that tests the riskiest assumption with real users, measure what matters, and decide to pivot, persist, or kill.

Author

Eric Ries (Lean Startup); antecedents in Steve Blank’s customer development



An MVP is not a scrappy V1; it’s an experiment designed to maximise learning per unit time/cash. You identify the assumptions that could break the idea (value, growth, feasibility, viability), pick the fastest ethical test, and read clear metrics to decide next steps. Forms range from simple smoke tests to concierge or wizard-of-oz trials before writing full software.

How it works


Riskiest Assumption (RAT) – value, demand, acquisition, monetisation, feasibility, or legality—test the one that can kill you first.

MVP formats (choose to fit the risk)

  • Landing page / fake door (register interest, pre-orders).
  • Concierge (deliver manually to a few customers).
  • Wizard-of-oz (front-end real, back-end manual).
  • Prototype/video (show, then measure intent).
  • Single-feature slice (only the core job).
  • Marketplace bootstrap (hand-curated supply/demand).

Build–Measure–Learn loop – specify a prediction, a metric, and a threshold before you build.

Decision rules – pass → scale/iterate; borderline → refine and re-test; fail → pivot or stop.

Use-cases


New venture or product line – validate demand and WTP before full build.

Major features/price changes – test impact with a gated cohort.

Hardware/services – “pretotype” with videos, deposits, or manual fulfilment.

Marketplaces – prove both-sided pull with manual matching.

Pitfalls & Cautions


MVP ≠ low-quality V1 – shipping half-baked core experiences burns trust; test the claim, not polish, unless polish is the claim.

No thresholds – without pre-set pass/fail lines you’ll rationalise any result.

Wrong audience – testing with non-buyers gives false negatives/positives.

Vanity metrics – pageviews and likes; prefer conversion, retention, WTP, unit economics.

Ethics & brand risk – fake doors: be transparent, capture interest, and follow up; don’t charge without fulfilment.

Scaling too soon – “success” on tiny samples can vanish; re-test on a larger cohort first.

Related Mental Models

Click below to learn other mental models

  • Lindy Effect

    Lindy Effect

    For non-perishable things (ideas, books, protocols), the older it is, the longer it’s likely to last.

  • Comparative Advantage

    Comparative Advantage

    Specialise in what you produce at lower opportunity cost and trade the rest.

  • Alloying

    Alloying

    Combine complementary capabilities or assets so the composite is stronger than the parts—materials science as a strategy metaphor.

Preparing reader…