Regret Minimalisation Framework

Project yourself to the decision horizon and choose the option that you will regret least. Weight omissions heavily, and treat reversibility as a key lever.

Author

Popularised by Jeff Bezos



Jeff Bezos described using this frame in 1994 to decide whether to start Amazon: imagine yourself at 80, look back, and pick the path with the fewest deep regrets.

The model is a decision heuristic for high-uncertainty, identity-relevant choices.

How it works


Time horizon – pick the age or point-in-time you will judge from (e.g. 80 years old, 10 years out).

Regret typesomissions (things not tried) often sting longer than commissions (tries that failed).

Reversibility – two-way doors invite action; one-way doors raise the evidence bar and risk controls.

Asymmetric bets – prioritise options with capped downside and large upside to minimise future regret.

Identity alignment – choose paths consistent with values you want your future self to endorse.

Use-cases


Career moves – role changes, founding a venture, relocating.

Product bets – greenlighting an experiment or entering a niche.

Investing – sizing into a thesis where upside is power-law, downside bounded.

Negotiations – deciding when to walk or accept terms based on future-self view.

Personal commitments – education, partnerships, long projects.

Pitfalls & Cautions


Fantasy future self – idealised horizons that ignore current constraints and base rates.

Action bias – doing for its own sake; still reject bad EV moves even if “bold”.

Status quo disguise – using the frame to rationalise inaction; compare regrets of not trying.

One-way door blindness – underestimating irreversibility; add guardrails before leaping.

Value drift – revisit as values or circumstances change; the horizon can move.

Recent Mental Models

Click below to learn other mental models

  • The Idea Maze

    The Idea Maze

    Before building, map the space: the key forks, dead ends and dependencies—so you can choose a promising path and run smarter tests.

  • Thucydides Trap

    Thucydides Trap

    When a rising power threatens to displace a ruling power, fear and miscalculation can tip competition into conflict unless incentives and guardrails are redesigned.

  • Zero to One

    Zero to One

    Aim for vertical progress—create something truly new (0 → 1), not just more of the same (1 → n). Win by building a monopoly on a focused niche and compounding from there.