Regret Minimalisation Framework
Project yourself to the decision horizon and choose the option that you will regret least. Weight omissions heavily, and treat reversibility as a key lever.
Author
Popularised by Jeff Bezos
Model type

Project yourself to the decision horizon and choose the option that you will regret least. Weight omissions heavily, and treat reversibility as a key lever.
Popularised by Jeff Bezos

Jeff Bezos described using this frame in 1994 to decide whether to start Amazon: imagine yourself at 80, look back, and pick the path with the fewest deep regrets.
The model is a decision heuristic for high-uncertainty, identity-relevant choices.
Time horizon – pick the age or point-in-time you will judge from (e.g. 80 years old, 10 years out).
Regret types – omissions (things not tried) often sting longer than commissions (tries that failed).
Reversibility – two-way doors invite action; one-way doors raise the evidence bar and risk controls.
Asymmetric bets – prioritise options with capped downside and large upside to minimise future regret.
Identity alignment – choose paths consistent with values you want your future self to endorse.
Career moves – role changes, founding a venture, relocating.
Product bets – greenlighting an experiment or entering a niche.
Investing – sizing into a thesis where upside is power-law, downside bounded.
Negotiations – deciding when to walk or accept terms based on future-self view.
Personal commitments – education, partnerships, long projects.
Set the horizon – “When I’m [age/date], what will I wish I had done?”
List options with a one-line upside, downside, and probability sketch.
Mark reversibility – two-way or one-way door; add risk caps for one-way doors.
Write the future note – a 5–7 line letter from your future self about likely regrets for each option.
Choose the least-regret path; act now on the first reversible step and calendar a review.
Fantasy future self – idealised horizons that ignore current constraints and base rates.
Action bias – doing for its own sake; still reject bad EV moves even if “bold”.
Status quo disguise – using the frame to rationalise inaction; compare regrets of not trying.
One-way door blindness – underestimating irreversibility; add guardrails before leaping.
Value drift – revisit as values or circumstances change; the horizon can move.
Click below to learn other mental models

Before building, map the space: the key forks, dead ends and dependencies—so you can choose a promising path and run smarter tests.

When a rising power threatens to displace a ruling power, fear and miscalculation can tip competition into conflict unless incentives and guardrails are redesigned.

Aim for vertical progress—create something truly new (0 → 1), not just more of the same (1 → n). Win by building a monopoly on a focused niche and compounding from there.