Principal-Agent Problem

When decision rights are delegated, agents optimise their own payoff under information asymmetry. Without smart contracts and governance, effort, risk and horizon drift away from the principal’s goals.

Author

Economics/contract theory (Jensen–Meckling; Akerlof; Holmström)



This shows up any time one party acts on another’s behalf — executives for shareholders, sales reps for a firm, contractors for clients. Agents know more about their actions than principals do, and they optimise for their own payoff. The model gives simple levers to close that gap: incentives, visibility, risk-sharing, and selection.

How it works


Different goals – pay, status, workload vs long-term firm value.
Information gaps – agent effort/quality is hard to observe.
Hidden action – risk-taking or shirking after the deal (moral hazard).
Hidden info – weak agents/projects select into rich terms (adverse selection).
Horizon & risk mismatch – short bonuses vs long outcomes; agents bear undiversified risk.
Metric distortion – pay one KPI, get that KPI (and collateral damage).

Use-cases


Executive & sales compensation – equity/vesting, quota design, clawbacks.
Asset management – GP–LP fees, carry, high-water marks, hurdles.
Franchising & platforms – brand standards, audits, rating systems.
Outsourcing/procurement – SLAs, penalties/bonuses, termination rights.
Insurance & lending – deductibles, covenants, monitoring.
M&A integration – earn-outs, retention and founder handover risk.
Public sector – contractor incentives vs service quality; PPPs.

Pitfalls & Cautions


Paying the proxy – targets hit, mission missed (Goodhart).
Short-termism – annual bonuses that burn long-term value.
All-variable or all-fixed pay – misaligned risk sharing; mix matters.
One-metric comp – multitasking distortion; include quality/satisfaction/sustainability.
Over-monitoring – kills autonomy and intrinsic motivation; use trust + verification.
Adverse selection via rich terms – the wrong agents self-select into your scheme.

Recent Mental Models

Click below to learn other mental models

  • The Idea Maze

    The Idea Maze

    Before building, map the space: the key forks, dead ends and dependencies—so you can choose a promising path and run smarter tests.

  • Thucydides Trap

    Thucydides Trap

    When a rising power threatens to displace a ruling power, fear and miscalculation can tip competition into conflict unless incentives and guardrails are redesigned.

  • Zero to One

    Zero to One

    Aim for vertical progress—create something truly new (0 → 1), not just more of the same (1 → n). Win by building a monopoly on a focused niche and compounding from there.