Comparative Advantage
Specialise in what you produce at lower opportunity cost and trade the rest.
Author
David Ricardo (1817)
Model type
About
Comparative advantage explains why two parties can both gain from trade even if one is absolutely better at everything. What matters isn’t absolute productivity, but what you give up to make one thing instead of another (opportunity cost). By specialising where your opportunity cost is lowest and trading, total output and joint surplus rise.
How it works
Opportunity cost – the value of the best alternative forgone. With two outputs A and B,
• OC(A) = resources for A ÷ resources for B (in units of B), and vice versa.
Comparative vs absolute – you can be slower at both goods (no absolute advantage) yet still have lower OC in one.
Terms of trade – mutually beneficial prices lie between the two parties’ opportunity costs.
Generalises – works for countries, firms, teams and individuals; any context with scarce resources and different trade-offs.
Friction matters – gains must exceed transport, coordination, risk and quality costs.
Use-cases
Sourcing/outsourcing – allocate components to the plant or partner with the lowest opportunity cost, not just lowest wage.
Org design – split work so teams focus on their highest-fit capabilities; partner for the rest.
Personal productivity – delegate tasks where your OC is high (they displace your highest-value work).
Market entry – export where you have a relative edge; import what’s relatively costly for you to produce.
Step-by-step
List the outputs (two to start) and the agents (teams/suppliers/countries).
Estimate unit resources (hours, £, capacity points) for each agent × output.
Compute opportunity costs per agent (e.g., OC of Good A = hours(A)/hours(B)).
Assign specialisation – each agent makes the good where its OC is lowest.
Set terms of trade between the two OCs; both sides must be better off than autarky.
Check frictions and risk – transport, defect rate, FX, lead times, IP; include these in the OC.
Pilot and measure – compare delivered cost, cycle time, quality, and resilience; scale if net surplus holds.
Worked mini-example (Ricardo-style)
Hours per unit
• England: Cloth 100h, Wine 120h
• Portugal: Cloth 90h, Wine 80h
Opportunity costs
• England: OC(Cloth) = 100/120 = 0.83 Wine; OC(Wine) = 120/100 = 1.20 Cloth
• Portugal: OC(Cloth) = 90/80 = 1.125 Wine; OC(Wine) = 80/90 = 0.89 Cloth
Specialise
• England → Cloth (lower OC in cloth)
• Portugal → Wine (lower OC in wine)
Terms of trade (example)
• 1 Cloth ↔ 1 Wine (lies between 0.83 and 1.125 Wine per Cloth) benefits both compared with self-sufficiency.
Pitfalls & Cautions
Confusing absolute and comparative advantage – the fastest producer shouldn’t do everything if OC differs.
Ignoring frictions – transport, coordination, defect risk and IP/security can wipe out gains.
Static trap – specialisation can lock you into yesterday’s edge; revisit as tech, scale and learning curves shift.
Capacity & lumpy costs – step-fixed costs or minimum viable scale can break simple ratios.
Unpriced externalities – environmental or geopolitical risks alter true costs.
Single-point dependence – diversify critical inputs; don’t trade resilience for pennies.
Recent Mental Models
Click below to learn other mental models
The Idea Maze
Before building, map the space: the key forks, dead ends and dependencies—so you can choose a promising path and run smarter tests.
Thucydides Trap
When a rising power threatens to displace a ruling power, fear and miscalculation can tip competition into conflict unless incentives and guardrails are redesigned.
Zero to One
Aim for vertical progress—create something truly new (0 → 1), not just more of the same (1 → n). Win by building a monopoly on a focused niche and compounding from there.
